Repeatability
Medium
The general pattern of code-splitting and tree-shaking is well-understood and structurally similar across projects, but Electron's dual-process architecture (main vs. renderer) and each project's specific dependency graph require unique judgment about what to lazy-load and where split points should go.
Ambiguity Tolerance
Medium
Success criteria are partially crisp — bundle size and startup time are measurable — but the agent cannot self-verify these numbers without executing the build and running the app. The 'report' requirement implies real benchmarks, not estimates.
Data & Tool Availability
Low
The agent needs the full repo, existing webpack config, package.json, and the ability to run builds and profile startup in an Electron environment. Without file access and a live execution environment, it can only produce a config diff based on assumptions.
Error Cost
Medium
A misconfigured webpack split can break the Electron app entirely or cause subtle runtime failures in the main process. Errors are reversible via version control, but debugging a broken Electron build is non-trivial and time-consuming.
Human Judgment Required
Medium
Deciding which modules are truly non-critical for cold startup requires understanding the app's UX flow and user expectations — judgment a developer familiar with the product is better positioned to make. The mechanical config changes are automatable; the prioritization is not.